Links
Home
Oracle DBA Forum
Frequent Oracle Errors
TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified
Backtrace message unwound by exceptions
invalid identifier
PL/SQL compilation error
internal error
missing expression
table or view does not exist
end-of-file on communication channel
TNS:listener unknown in connect descriptor
insufficient privileges
PL/SQL: numeric or value error string
TNS:protocol adapter error
ORACLE not available
target host or object does not exist
invalid number
unable to allocate string bytes of shared memory
resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
error occurred at recursive SQL level string
ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
archiver error. Connect internal only, until freed
snapshot too old
unable to extend temp segment by string in tablespace
Credential retrieval failed
missing or invalid option
invalid username/password; logon denied
unable to create INITIAL extent for segment
out of process memory when trying to allocate string bytes
shared memory realm does not exist
cannot insert NULL
TNS:unable to connect to destination
remote database not found'>ora-02019
exception encountered: core dump
inconsistent datatypes
no data found
TNS:operation timed out
PL/SQL: could not find program
existing state of packages has been discarded
maximum number of processes exceeded
error signaled in parallel query server
ORACLE instance terminated. Disconnection forced
TNS:packet writer failure
see ORA-12699
missing right parenthesis
name is already used by an existing object
cannot identify/lock data file
invalid file operation
quoted string not properly terminated
AD_APPLIED_PATCHES

AD_APPLIED_PATCHES

2004-06-04       - By Freeman, Donald

Reply:     <<     11     12     13     14     15     16     17     18     19     20     >>  

Jared, I don 't know if you noticed but all of your posts are appearing to me in about 5 point type. They didn 't use to do that. Did you change something or am I the only one this is happening to?

-- --Original Message-- --
From: oracle-l-bounce@(protected) [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)]On Behalf Of Jared.Still@(protected)
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:52 PM
To: oracle-l@(protected)
Subject: RE: AD_APPLIED_PATCHES




> Jared
> Did you affix a copyright statement to it? That was one lesson I learned
> from a software vendor I used to work for. Some people will strip the
> copyright statement off, but most people will leave it attached. Then you
> can tell the auditor something like "hey this was written by a real expert. "
> Or "hey you guys removed my copyright statement ".
>

No I didn 't. My experiences with a script that is (was?) on MetaLink prove
that this is largely irrelavant, as that script had everything except the
header, which had been neatly removed.

Yes, legal action is possible I suppose, but not worth the time
and expense in that case.

Jared



<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN " >
<HTML > <HEAD >
<META HTTP-EQUIV= "Content-Type " CONTENT= "text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 " >


<META content= "MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400 " name=GENERATOR > </HEAD >
<BODY >
<DIV > <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2 > <SPAN class=848045518-04062004 >Jared,
I don 't know if you noticed but all of your posts are appearing to me in about 5
point type.  They didn 't use to do that.  Did you change something or
am I the only one this is happening to? </SPAN > </FONT > </DIV >
<BLOCKQUOTE
style= "PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid " >
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left > <FONT face=Tahoma
size=2 >-- --Original Message-- -- <BR > <B >From: </B >
oracle-l-bounce@(protected) [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)] <B >On
Behalf Of </B >Jared.Still@(protected) <BR > <B >Sent: </B > Friday, June 04, 2004
2:52 PM <BR > <B >To: </B > oracle-l@(protected) <BR > <B >Subject: </B > RE:
AD_APPLIED_PATCHES <BR > <BR > </FONT > </DIV > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT > <BR >>
Jared <BR >>     Did you affix a copyright statement to it? That
was one lesson I learned <BR >> from a software vendor I used to work for.
Some people will strip the <BR >> copyright statement off, but most people
will leave it attached. Then you <BR >> can tell the auditor something like
"hey this was written by a real expert. " <BR >> Or "hey you guys removed my
copyright statement ". <BR >> <BR > </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >No I
didn 't.  My experiences with a script that is (was?) on MetaLink
prove </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >that this is largely irrelavant, as
that script had everything except the </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >header,
which had been neatly removed. </TT > </FONT > <BR > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >Yes, legal
action is possible I suppose, but not worth the time </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT
size=2 > <TT >and expense in that case. </TT > </FONT > <BR > <BR > <FONT
size=2 > <TT >Jared </TT > </FONT > <BR > </BLOCKQUOTE > </BODY > </HTML >