No - his posts appear the same way to me. My eyes hurt.
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
From: oracle-l-bounce@(protected)
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)] On Behalf Of Freeman, Donald
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:56 PM
To: oracle-l@(protected)
Subject: RE: AD_APPLIED_PATCHES
Jared, I don 't know if you noticed but all of your posts are appearing
to me in about 5 point type. They didn 't use to do that. Did you
change something or am I the only one this is happening to?
-- --Original Message-- --
From: oracle-l-bounce@(protected)
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)]On Behalf Of
Jared.Still@(protected)
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 2:52 PM
To: oracle-l@(protected)
Subject: RE: AD_APPLIED_PATCHES
> Jared
> Did you affix a copyright statement to it? That was one
lesson I learned
> from a software vendor I used to work for. Some people will
strip the
> copyright statement off, but most people will leave it
attached. Then you
> can tell the auditor something like "hey this was written by a
real expert. "
> Or "hey you guys removed my copyright statement ".
>
No I didn 't. My experiences with a script that is (was?) on
MetaLink prove
that this is largely irrelavant, as that script had everything
except the
header, which had been neatly removed.
Yes, legal action is possible I suppose, but not worth the time
and expense in that case.
Jared
**DISCLAIMER
This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to the extent that it relates to their official business. <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN " >
<HTML > <HEAD >
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content= "text/html; charset=us-ascii " >
<META content= "MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400 " name=GENERATOR > </HEAD >
<BODY >
<DIV dir=ltr align=left > <SPAN class=510235718-04062004 > <FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2 >No - his posts appear the same way to me. My eyes
hurt. </FONT > </SPAN > </DIV > <BR >
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left >
<HR tabIndex=-1 >
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2 > <B >From: </B > oracle-l-bounce@(protected)
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)] <B >On Behalf Of </B >Freeman,
Donald <BR > <B >Sent: </B > Friday, June 04, 2004 2:56 PM <BR > <B >To: </B >
oracle-l@(protected) <BR > <B >Subject: </B > RE:
AD_APPLIED_PATCHES <BR > </FONT > <BR > </DIV >
<DIV > </DIV >
<DIV > <FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2 > <SPAN class=848045518-04062004 >Jared,
I don 't know if you noticed but all of your posts are appearing to me in about 5
point type. They didn 't use to do that. Did you change something or
am I the only one this is happening to? </SPAN > </FONT > </DIV >
<BLOCKQUOTE
style= "PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid " >
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left > <FONT face=Tahoma
size=2 >-- --Original Message-- -- <BR > <B >From: </B >
oracle-l-bounce@(protected) [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)] <B >On
Behalf Of </B >Jared.Still@(protected) <BR > <B >Sent: </B > Friday, June 04, 2004
2:52 PM <BR > <B >To: </B > oracle-l@(protected) <BR > <B >Subject: </B > RE:
AD_APPLIED_PATCHES <BR > <BR > </FONT > </DIV > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT > <BR >>
Jared <BR >> Did you affix a copyright statement to it? That
was one lesson I learned <BR >> from a software vendor I used to work for.
Some people will strip the <BR >> copyright statement off, but most people
will leave it attached. Then you <BR >> can tell the auditor something like
"hey this was written by a real expert. " <BR >> Or "hey you guys removed my
copyright statement ". <BR >> <BR > </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >No I
didn 't. My experiences with a script that is (was?) on MetaLink
prove </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >that this is largely irrelavant, as
that script had everything except the </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >header,
which had been neatly removed. </TT > </FONT > <BR > <BR > <FONT size=2 > <TT >Yes, legal
action is possible I suppose, but not worth the time </TT > </FONT > <BR > <FONT
size=2 > <TT >and expense in that case. </TT > </FONT > <BR > <BR > <FONT
size=2 > <TT >Jared </TT > </FONT > <BR > </BLOCKQUOTE > <br > <br > <br >**DISCLAIMER <br >This e-mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may contain information that is privileged, proprietary and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail message. The contents do not represent the opinion of D&E except to the extent that it relates to their official business. </BODY > </HTML >
